Love it! Reminds me of our chat in which we also talked about legos. Great how you tied in physics with philosophy here.
A thought i had: for some reason it also feels the creativity point is relevant to the current LLM ai models, as in, that there can grow a bigger and bigger mismatch—or less creative output—the longer an ai model reiterates over itself without new/external input.
Your AI point makes a lot of sense. I guess that, regarding my topic, I think "the way to go" is to make sure we're working on a symbiosis between artist and AI.
Love it! Reminds me of our chat in which we also talked about legos. Great how you tied in physics with philosophy here.
A thought i had: for some reason it also feels the creativity point is relevant to the current LLM ai models, as in, that there can grow a bigger and bigger mismatch—or less creative output—the longer an ai model reiterates over itself without new/external input.
It's so nice to hear from you Jibran! Thank you.
Your AI point makes a lot of sense. I guess that, regarding my topic, I think "the way to go" is to make sure we're working on a symbiosis between artist and AI.